One of those tactical puzzles that its good to see in real life !
![]() |
| White to play and win |
Notes from the nadir of chess
Maybe 'combination' isn't the precise word here, as I'm sure it has a particular definition, but its good enough for me.
The European Team Championship is on in Crete at the moment, and, in the time I found to watch it I was lucky enough to see a very nice finish by Sophie Millet in her game against Borka Franciskovic.
Black has just played Qd8 and after a couple of minutes thought White replies with a simple move, but a devastating combination follows...mate in 5.
| |||
| White to play |
![]() |
| 15... Nc4 White to play |
Posted by Signalman at 09:18 0 comments
Labels: European Team Championship, Tactics
I'm sure we've all experienced the downside of blitz chess.
Not the mistake you make because of a lack of time or calculation, but the painful game where you realise after a few moves that your opponent is a complete novice at chess and either you choose to resign, to save more suffering on both parties, or you play on and prove that you know what you are doing !
Below a recent 'play on' choice which produced the obvious result in 8 moves. It was Rh3 that confirmed I was up against an almost complete novice, although the big clues were 1.h3 and 2.a3, despite the fact that these are sometimes played by bullish players as a psychological prod to the opposition.
![]() | |||
| A blitz mate ! |
![]() |
| Black to play |
Posted by Signalman at 12:25 0 comments
Calculation in chess is a wonderful skill to develop, as well as being an essential one in almost any position.
Its probably a major difference between the various levels of chess player, with a GM seemingly displaying a grasp of calculation that is far in excess of anything an amateur can achieve.
This is perhaps the key : a GM is a professional chess player, so although a GM displays this incredible skill, it is probably not innate.
There might well be a natural core available, but I suspect it is extensive practice and experience that allows the skill to develop to the levels seen in GM-play.
I found the below demonstration and exposition of calculating skills by GM Nadezhda Kosintseva to be quite amazing.
She takes a position (shown below) and proceeds to analyse it deeply and fully, bringing out a remarkable amount of information from what appears to be a straightforward position at first glance.
Its a long video ( an hour ) but worth watching for the way she analyses and how the methods can be learned.
Helpful ( or maybe, educational ) to think about the position first, before watching.
![]() |
| White to play [1rb3nr/1pN1kppp/p7/4p3/3nq3/4B3/PPP1BPPP/R2QK2R w KQ - 0 1] |
Posted by Signalman at 10:32 0 comments
Labels: Calculation
I am told that variety is needed in training, so, as a change from my usual d4 & London System I have started to play 1.e4 as white, .
It is quite pleasant meeting king pawn openings again, though I admit that since I am playing e4 to aim for my own choice of openings, although I do encounter the Sicilian at times ( met by a twist of the Réti Gambit ) or the French ( met with the plain Réti Gambit ), I usually see e5, and end up playing a variation of the Centre Game, at one time the preferred way for me to avoid main e4 openings.
An enjoyable, and tactic-filled opening, especially if Black follows the 'main line' and accepts the gambit pawn.
Declining it, or playing less known variations allows a more placid and manoeuvring game, which is perfectly enjoyable.
In a recent 15 minute game, I had much the better of the play, but in the position below, I missed a lovely opportunity to display my tactical genius, as well as take a significant advantage in the game.
![]() |
| White to Play |
Posted by Signalman at 09:00 0 comments
Labels: Centre Game, Tactics
Although I wonder about the direct link between training tactics, and actual improvement over the board, not having the time ( or direct experience) to perform a controlled self-experiment to check this, I can go only by impression and feeling.
Using these, I feel the biggest improvement is in my behaviour at the board.
Generally, I take more time to look around it board before I move, and try to check more often if tactics are present.
This doesn't mean that I always "see" the tactics on the board, but I feel sure it helps my game overall.
Sometimes, though, my mind deceives me.
It sees a solution, and something clicks that overrides the trigger to check again, resulting in a poor move.
For example, in this Chess Tempo problem below, I saw what had to be the solution, as I was looking for checkmate.
![]() |
| 37.a4 Black to play |
![]() |
| White to play |
Posted by Signalman at 08:12 0 comments
Technically, it would be difficult to fail this mate problem, as there were 4 or 5 alternatives given in Chess Tempo. However, I was pleas...